BibTex format
@article{Davies:2024:1538-4357/ad64cb,
author = {Davies, EE and Rüdisser, HT and Amerstorfer, UV and Möstl, C and Bauer, M and Weiler, E and Amerstorfer, T and Majumdar, S and Hess, P and Weiss, AJ and Reiss, MA and Green, LM and Long, DM and Nieves-Chinchilla, T and Trotta, D and Horbury, TS and OBrien, H and Fauchon-Jones, E and Morris, J and Owen, CJ and Bale, SD and Kasper, JC},
doi = {1538-4357/ad64cb},
journal = {Astrophysical Journal},
title = {Flux Rope Modeling of the 2022 September 5 Coronal Mass Ejection Observed by Parker Solar Probe and Solar Orbiter from 0.07 to 0.69 au},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad64cb},
volume = {973},
year = {2024}
}
RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)
TY - JOUR
AB - As both Parker Solar Probe (PSP) and Solar Orbiter (SolO) reach heliocentric distances closer to the Sun, they present an exciting opportunity to study the structure of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) in the inner heliosphere. We present an analysis of the global flux rope structure of the 2022 September 5 CME event that impacted PSP at a heliocentric distance of only 0.07 au and SolO at 0.69 au. We compare in situ measurements at PSP and SolO to determine global and local expansion measures, finding a good agreement between magnetic field relationships with heliocentric distance, but significant differences with respect to flux rope size. We use PSP/Wide-Field Imager for Solar Probe images as input to the ELlipse Evolution model based on Heliospheric Imager data (or ELEvoHI), providing a direct link between remote and in situ observations; we find a large discrepancy between the resulting modeled arrival times, suggesting that the underlying model assumptions may not be suitable when using data obtained close to the Sun, where the drag regime is markedly different in comparison to larger heliocentric distances. Finally, we fit the SolO's magnetometer and PSP's FIELDS data independently with the 3D Coronal ROpe Ejection (or 3DCORE) model, and find that many parameters are consistent between spacecraft. However, challenges are apparent when reconstructing a global 3D structure that aligns with arrival times at PSP and SolO, likely due to the large radial and longitudinal separations between spacecraft. From our model results, it is clear the solar wind background speed and drag regime strongly affect the modeled expansion and propagation of CMEs and need to be taken into consideration.
AU - Davies,EE
AU - Rüdisser,HT
AU - Amerstorfer,UV
AU - Möstl,C
AU - Bauer,M
AU - Weiler,E
AU - Amerstorfer,T
AU - Majumdar,S
AU - Hess,P
AU - Weiss,AJ
AU - Reiss,MA
AU - Green,LM
AU - Long,DM
AU - Nieves-Chinchilla,T
AU - Trotta,D
AU - Horbury,TS
AU - OBrien,H
AU - Fauchon-Jones,E
AU - Morris,J
AU - Owen,CJ
AU - Bale,SD
AU - Kasper,JC
DO - 1538-4357/ad64cb
PY - 2024///
SN - 0004-637X
TI - Flux Rope Modeling of the 2022 September 5 Coronal Mass Ejection Observed by Parker Solar Probe and Solar Orbiter from 0.07 to 0.69 au
T2 - Astrophysical Journal
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad64cb
VL - 973
ER -