In this section
@article{Deshpande:2020:10.1007/s00422-020-00846-6,
author = {Deshpande, A and Ouldridge, T},
doi = {10.1007/s00422-020-00846-6},
journal = {Biological Cybernetics: communication and control in organisms and automata},
pages = {653--668},
title = {Optimizing enzymatic catalysts for rapid turnover of substrates with low enzyme sequestration},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00422-020-00846-6},
volume = {114},
year = {2020}
}
TY - JOUR
AB - Enzymes are central to both metabolism and information processing in cells. In both cases, an enzyme’s ability to accelerate a reaction without being consumed in the reaction is crucial. Nevertheless, enzymes are transiently sequestered when they bind to their substrates; this sequestration limits activity and potentially compromises information processing and signal transduction. In this article, we analyse the mechanism of enzyme–substrate catalysis from the perspective of minimizing the load on the enzymes through sequestration, while maintaining at least a minimum reaction flux. In particular, we ask: which binding free energies of the enzyme–substrate and enzyme–product reaction intermediates minimize the fraction of enzymes sequestered in complexes, while sustaining a certain minimal flux? Under reasonable biophysical assumptions, we find that the optimal design will saturate the bound on the minimal flux and reflects a basic trade-off in catalytic operation. If both binding free energies are too high, there is low sequestration, but the effective progress of the reaction is hampered. If both binding free energies are too low, there is high sequestration, and the reaction flux may also be suppressed in extreme cases. The optimal binding free energies are therefore neither too high nor too low, but in fact moderate. Moreover, the optimal difference in substrate and product binding free energies, which contributes to the thermodynamic driving force of the reaction, is in general strongly constrained by the intrinsic free-energy difference between products and reactants. Both the strategies of using a negative binding free-energy difference to drive the catalyst-bound reaction forward and of using a positive binding free-energy difference to enhance detachment of the product are limited in their efficacy.
AU - Deshpande,A
AU - Ouldridge,T
DO - 10.1007/s00422-020-00846-6
EP - 668
PY - 2020///
SN - 0340-1200
SP - 653
TI - Optimizing enzymatic catalysts for rapid turnover of substrates with low enzyme sequestration
T2 - Biological Cybernetics: communication and control in organisms and automata
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00422-020-00846-6
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/85338
VL - 114
ER -
Join our mailing list for regular updates, news, events and opportunities