In this section
@article{Chacón:2024:10.1145/3660649,
author = {Chacón, Quesada R and Demiris, Y},
doi = {10.1145/3660649},
journal = {ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction},
title = {Multi-dimensional evaluation of an augmented reality head-mounted display user interface for controlling legged manipulators},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3660649},
volume = {13},
year = {2024}
}
TY - JOUR
AB - Controlling assistive robots can be challenging for some users, especially those lacking relevant experience. Augmented Reality (AR) User Interfaces (UIs) have the potential to facilitate this task. Although extensive research regarding legged manipulators exists, comparatively little is on their UIs. Most existing UIs leverage traditional control interfaces such as joysticks, Hand-Held (HH) controllers and 2D UIs. These interfaces not only risk being unintuitive, thus discouraging interaction with the robot partner, but also draw the operator’s focus away from the task and towards the UI. This shift in attention raises additional safety concerns, particularly in potentially hazardous environments where legged manipulators are frequently deployed. Moreover, traditional interfaces limit the operators’ availability to use their hands for other tasks. Towards overcoming these limitations, in this article, we provide a user study comparing an AR Head-Mounted Display (HMD) UI we developed for controlling a legged manipulator against off-the-shelf control methods for such robots. This user study involved 27 participants and 135 trials, from which we gathered over 405 completed questionnaires. These trials involved multiple navigation and manipulation tasks with varying difficulty levels using a Boston Dynamics’s Spot, a 7 df Kinova robot arm and a Robotiq 2F-85 gripper that we integrated into a legged manipulator. We made the comparison between UIs across multiple dimensions relevant to a successful human–robot interaction. These dimensions include cognitive workload, technology acceptance, fluency, system usability, immersion and trust. Our study employed a factorial experimental design with participants undergoing five different conditions, generating longitudinal data. Due to potential unknown distributions and outliers in such data, using parametric methods for its analysis is questionable, and while non-parametric alternatives exist, they may
AU - Chacón,Quesada R
AU - Demiris,Y
DO - 10.1145/3660649
PY - 2024///
SN - 2573-9522
TI - Multi-dimensional evaluation of an augmented reality head-mounted display user interface for controlling legged manipulators
T2 - ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3660649
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/114812
VL - 13
ER -
