In this section
@article{Soreq:2021:10.1038/s41467-021-22199-9,
author = {Soreq, E and Violante, IR and Daws, R and Hampshire, A},
doi = {10.1038/s41467-021-22199-9},
journal = {Nature Communications},
title = {Neuroimaging evidence for a network sampling theory of individual differences in human intelligence},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22199-9},
volume = {12},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR
AB - Despite a century of research, it remains unclear whether human intelligence should be studied as one dominant, several major, or many distinct abilities, and how such abilities relate to the functional organisation of the brain. Here, we combine psychometric and machine learning methods to examine in a data-driven manner how factor structure and individual variability in cognitive-task performance relate to dynamic-network connectomics. We report that 12 sub-tasks from an established intelligence test can be accurately multi-way classified (74%, chance 8.3%) based on the network states that they evoke. The proximities of the tasks in behavioural-psychometric space correlate with the similarities of their network states. Furthermore, the network states were more accurately classified for higher relative to lower performing individuals. These results suggest that the human brain uses a high-dimensional network-sampling mechanism to flexibly code for diverse cognitive tasks. Population variability in intelligence test performance relates to the fidelity of expression of these task-optimised network states.
AU - Soreq,E
AU - Violante,IR
AU - Daws,R
AU - Hampshire,A
DO - 10.1038/s41467-021-22199-9
PY - 2021///
SN - 2041-1723
TI - Neuroimaging evidence for a network sampling theory of individual differences in human intelligence
T2 - Nature Communications
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22199-9
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/88396
VL - 12
ER -
Centre Manager
Kate Hobson
Email: k.hobson@imperial.ac.uk
