BibTex format
@article{Villeneuve:2018:10.3310/hsdr06350,
author = {Villeneuve, E and Pitt, M and Landa, P and Allen, M and Spencer, A and Prosser, S and Gibson, A and Kelsey, K and Mujica-Mota, R and Manktelow, B and Modi, N and Thornton, S and Pitt, M},
doi = {10.3310/hsdr06350},
journal = {Health Services and Delivery Research},
title = {A framework to address key issues of neonatal service configuration in England: the NeoNet multimethods study},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/hsdr06350},
volume = {6},
year = {2018}
}
RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)
TY - JOUR
AB - BackgroundThere is an inherent tension in neonatal services between the efficiency and specialised care that comes with centralisation and the provision of local services with associated ease of access and community benefits. This study builds on previous work in South West England to address these issues at a national scale.Objectives(1) To develop an analytical framework to address key issues of neonatal service configuration in England, (2) to investigate visualisation tools to facilitate the communication of findings to stakeholder groups and (3) to assess parental preferences in relation to service configuration alternatives.Main outcome measuresThe ability to meet nurse staffing guidelines, volumes of units, costs, mortality, number and distance of transfers, travel distances and travel times for parents.DesignDescriptive statistics, location analysis, mathematical modelling, discrete event simulation and economic analysis were used. Qualitative methods were used to interview policy-makers and parents. A parent advisory group supported the study.SettingNHS neonatal services across England.DataNeonatal care data were sourced from the National Neonatal Research Database. Information on neonatal units was drawn from the National Neonatal Audit Programme. Geographic and demographic data were sourced from the Office for National Statistics. Travel time data were retrieved via a geographic information system. Birth data were sourced from Hospital Episode Statistics. Parental cost data were collected via a survey.ResultsLocation analysis shows that to achieve 100% of births in units with ≥ 6000 births per year, the number of birth centres would need to be reduced from 161 to approximately 72, with more parents travelling > 30 minutes. The maximum number of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) needed to achieve 100% of very low-birthweight infants attending high-volume units is 36 with existing NICUs, or 48 if NICUs are located wherever there is c
AU - Villeneuve,E
AU - Pitt,M
AU - Landa,P
AU - Allen,M
AU - Spencer,A
AU - Prosser,S
AU - Gibson,A
AU - Kelsey,K
AU - Mujica-Mota,R
AU - Manktelow,B
AU - Modi,N
AU - Thornton,S
AU - Pitt,M
DO - 10.3310/hsdr06350
PY - 2018///
SN - 2050-4349
TI - A framework to address key issues of neonatal service configuration in England: the NeoNet multimethods study
T2 - Health Services and Delivery Research
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/hsdr06350
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/65601
VL - 6
ER -
