Results
- Showing results for:
- Reset all filters
Search results
-
Journal articleTuncer M, Cobb JP, Hansen UN, et al., 2013,
Validation of multiple subject-specific finite element models of unicompartmental knee replacement
, MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, Vol: 35, Pages: 1457-1464, ISSN: 1350-4533- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 18
-
Journal articleBorhani M, McGregor AH, Bull AMJ, 2013,
An alternative technical marker set for the pelvis is more repeatable than the standard pelvic marker set
, Gait and Posture, Vol: 38, Pages: 1032-1037, ISSN: 0966-6362Multiple marker sets and models are currently available for assessing pelvic kinematics in gait. Despite the presence of a variety models, there are still debates on their reliability and consistency, and consequently there is no clearly defined standard. Two marker sets were evaluated in this study: the ‘Traditional’ where markers are placed at the anterior and posterior superior iliac spines (ASISs, PSISs); and the ‘Cluster’, where a cluster of three orthogonal markers fixed on a rigid based is attached to the sacrum. The two sets were compared with respect to intra and inter session standard deviations of maximum pelvic tilt, obliquity and rotation angles. The repeatability between and within sessions was measured using coefficient of multiple correlation (CMC). Also the similarity between the two sets was assessed using inter-protocol CMC (ipCMC). Both data sets generated showed high within and between session repeatability in the sagittal plane (CMC > 0.80), although the Cluster method showed higher repeatability than that of the Traditional method in non-sagittal plane motion for both within and between sessions. The authors are not aware of other studies reporting the differences in intra and inter session variability and repeatability values for different body mass index categories such as overweight and obese subjects with relatively large sample size. Hence the Cluster method overcomes a number of theoretical and experimental limitations such as minimising the marker occlusion and is a reliable alternative to the Traditional (the standard) marker set.
-
Journal articleDuffell LD, Gulati V, Southgate DFL, et al., 2013,
Measuring body weight distribution during sit-to-stand in patients with early knee osteoarthritis
, GAIT & POSTURE, Vol: 38, Pages: 745-750, ISSN: 0966-6362- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 31
-
Journal articleBergmann JHM, Graham S, Howard N, et al., 2013,
Comparison of median frequency between traditional and functional sensor placements during activity monitoring
, MEASUREMENT, Vol: 46, Pages: 2193-2200, ISSN: 0263-2241- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 3
-
Journal articlePincus T, Anwar S, McCracken L, et al., 2013,
Testing the credibility, feasibility and acceptability of an optimised behavioural intervention (OBI) for avoidant chronic low back pain patients: protocol for a randomised feasibility study
, TRIALS, Vol: 14, ISSN: 1745-6215- Author Web Link
- Open Access Link
- Cite
- Citations: 15
-
Journal articleCobb JP, 2013,
Untitled Response
, BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, Vol: 95B, Pages: 861-861, ISSN: 2049-4394- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 1
-
Journal articleHart AJ, Muirhead-Allwood S, Porter M, et al., 2013,
Which Factors Determine the Wear Rate of Large-Diameter Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements?
, JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, Vol: 95A, Pages: 678-685, ISSN: 0021-9355- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 53
-
Journal articleOsmani HT, Henckel J, Cobb J, et al., 2013,
Native acetabular version: 3D CT analysis of the psoas valley
, HIP INTERNATIONAL, Vol: 23, Pages: 274-280, ISSN: 1120-7000- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 1
-
Journal articleAlam M, Bull AMJ, Thomas RD, et al., 2011,
Measurement of Rotational Laxity of the Knee In Vitro Comparison of Accuracy Between the Tibia, Overlying Skin, and Foot
, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, Vol: 39, Pages: 2575-2581, ISSN: 0363-5465- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 21
This data is extracted from the Web of Science and reproduced under a licence from Thomson Reuters. You may not copy or re-distribute this data in whole or in part without the written consent of the Science business of Thomson Reuters.