Citation

BibTex format

@article{Radhakrishnan:2023:10.1038/s41598-022-27131-9,
author = {Radhakrishnan, ST and Gallagher, KI and Mullish, BH and Serrano-Contreras, JI and Alexander, JL and Miguens, Blanco J and Danckert, NP and Valdivia-Garcia, M and Hopkins, BJ and Ghai, A and Ayub, A and Li, JV and Marchesi, JR and Williams, HRT},
doi = {10.1038/s41598-022-27131-9},
journal = {Sci Rep},
title = {Rectal swabs as a viable alternative to faecal sampling for the analysis of gut microbiota functionality and composition.},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27131-9},
volume = {13},
year = {2023}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - Faecal or biopsy samples are frequently used to analyse the gut microbiota, but issues remain with the provision and collection of such samples. Rectal swabs are widely-utilised in clinical practice and previous data demonstrate their potential role in microbiota analyses; however, studies to date have been heterogenous, and there are a particular lack of data concerning the utility of swabs for the analysis of the microbiota's functionality and metabolome. We compared paired stool and rectal swab samples from healthy individuals to investigate whether rectal swabs are a reliable proxy for faecal sampling. There were no significant differences in key alpha and beta diversity measures between swab and faecal samples, and inter-subject variability was preserved. Additionally, no significant differences were demonstrated in abundance of major annotated phyla. Inferred gut functionality using Tax4Fun2 showed excellent correlation between the two sampling techniques (Pearson's coefficient r = 0.9217, P < 0.0001). Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy enabled the detection of 20 metabolites, with overall excellent correlation identified between rectal swab and faecal samples for levels all metabolites collectively, although more variable degrees of association between swab and stool for levels of individual metabolites. These data support the utility of rectal swabs in both compositional and functional analyses of the gut microbiota.
AU - Radhakrishnan,ST
AU - Gallagher,KI
AU - Mullish,BH
AU - Serrano-Contreras,JI
AU - Alexander,JL
AU - Miguens,Blanco J
AU - Danckert,NP
AU - Valdivia-Garcia,M
AU - Hopkins,BJ
AU - Ghai,A
AU - Ayub,A
AU - Li,JV
AU - Marchesi,JR
AU - Williams,HRT
DO - 10.1038/s41598-022-27131-9
PY - 2023///
TI - Rectal swabs as a viable alternative to faecal sampling for the analysis of gut microbiota functionality and composition.
T2 - Sci Rep
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27131-9
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36627399
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/102678
VL - 13
ER -

General enquiries


For any enquiries about the Microbiome Network at Imperial, please contact:

microbiome-network@imperial.ac.uk