In this section

Mechatronics in Medicine

Head of Group

Prof Ferdinando Rodriguez y Baena

B415C Bessemer Building

South Kensington Campus

About us

The MIM Lab develops robotic and mechatronics surgical systems for a variety of procedures.

Twitter/X: @MIMLab_Robotics
Youtube: Mechatronics in Medicine Lab

What we do

The Mechatronics in Medicine Laboratory develops robotic and mechatronics surgical systems for a variety of procedures including neuro, cardiovascular, orthopaedic surgeries, and colonoscopies. Examples include bio-inspired catheters that can navigate along complex paths within the brain (such as EDEN2020), soft robots to explore endoluminal anatomies (such as the colon), and virtual reality solutions to support surgeons during knee replacement surgeries.

Why it is important?

...

How can it benefit patients?

......

Meet the team

Mr Ayhan Aktas
Casual - Student demonstrator - lower rate

Dr Daniel Bautista Salinas
Research Associate

Dr Kaiwen Chen
Research Associate

Mr Zejian Cui
Research Postgraduate

Mr Connor Daly
Research Postgraduate

Emeritus Professor Brian L Davies FREng
Emeritus Professor

Mr Zhaoyang Jacopo Hu
Research Postgraduate

Dr Hisham M Iqbal
Research Associate

Mr Alex Ranne
Research Postgraduate

Professor Ferdinando M Rodriguez y Baena
Co-Director of Hamlyn Centre, Professor of Medical Robotics

Dr Jialei Shi
Research Associate

Mr Spyridon Souipas
Casual - Other work

Ms Emilia Zari
Research Postgraduate

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Davies:2007,
author = {Davies, BL and Rodriguez, y Baena F and Barrett, AR and Gomes, MP and Harris, SJ and Jakopec, M and Cobb, JP},
pages = {71--80},
title = {Robotic control in knee joint replacement surgery},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17315770},
volume = {221},
year = {2007}
}

Download

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB  - A brief history of robotic systems in knee arthroplasty is provided. The place of autonomous robots is then discussed and compared to more recent 'hands-on' robotic systems that can be more cost effective. The case is made for robotic systems to have a clear justification, with improved benefits compared to those from cheaper navigation systems. A number of more recent, smaller, robot systems for knee arthroplasty are also described. A specific example is given of an active constraint medical robot, the ACROBOT system, used in a prospective randomized controlled trial of unicondylar robotic knee arthroplasty in which the robot was compared to conventional surgery. The results of the trial are presented together with a discussion of the need for measures of accuracy to be introduced so that the efficacy of the robotic surgery can be immediately identified, rather than have to wait for a number of years before long-term clinical improvements can be demonstrated.
AU  - Davies,BL
AU  - Rodriguez,y Baena F
AU  - Barrett,AR
AU  - Gomes,MP
AU  - Harris,SJ
AU  - Jakopec,M
AU  - Cobb,JP
EP  - 80
PY  - 2007///
SN  - 0954-4119
SP  - 71
TI  - Robotic control in knee joint replacement surgery
UR  - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17315770
VL  - 221
ER  -