In this section
@article{Gill:2016:10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.003,
author = {Gill, RJ and Woodward, G},
doi = {10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.003},
journal = {Trends in Ecology & Evolution},
pages = {105--115},
title = {Networking our way to better ecosystem service provision},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.003},
volume = {31},
year = {2016}
}
TY - JOUR
AB - The ecosystem services (EcoS) concept is being used increasingly to attach values to natural systems and the multiple benefits they provide to human societies. Ecosystem processes or functions only become EcoS if they are shown to have social and/or economic value. This should assure an explicit connection between the natural and social sciences, but EcoS approaches have been criticized for retaining little natural science. Preserving the natural, ecological science context within EcoS research is challenging because the multiple disciplines involved have very different traditions and vocabularies (common-language challenge) and span many organizational levels and temporal and spatial scales (scale challenge) that define the relevant interacting entities (interaction challenge). We propose a network-based approach to transcend these discipline challenges and place the natural science context at the heart of EcoS research.
AU - Gill,RJ
AU - Woodward,G
DO - 10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.003
EP - 115
PY - 2016///
SN - 0169-5347
SP - 105
TI - Networking our way to better ecosystem service provision
T2 - Trends in Ecology & Evolution
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.003
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/28803
VL - 31
ER -
Climate Science
Earth and Life Sciences
Energy and Low-Carbon Futures
Resources and Pollution
Economics and Finance
Health
View all publications and browse by year
Briefing papers and Briefing notes
Grantham Institute Outlooks
Evidence & submission papers
Infographics