In this section
Use the links below to access our reports, or scroll down to use the search function to explore all of our publications including peer-reviewed papers and briefing papers.
@article{van:2020:10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009704,
author = {van, Dael J and Reader, T and Gillespie, A and Neves, A and Darzi, A and Mayer, E},
doi = {10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009704},
journal = {BMJ Quality and Safety},
pages = {684--695},
title = {Learning from complaints in healthcare: a realist review of academic literature, policy evidence, and frontline insights},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009704},
volume = {29},
year = {2020}
}
TY - JOUR
AB - Introduction A global rise in patient complaints has been accompanied by growing research to effectively analyse complaints for safer, more patient-centric care. Most patients and families complain to improve the quality of healthcare, yet progress has been complicated by a system primarily designed for case-by-case complaint handling.Aim To understand how to effectively integrate patient-centric complaint handling with quality monitoring and improvement.Method Literature screening and patient codesign shaped the review’s aim in the first stage of this three-stage review. Ten sources were searched including academic databases and policy archives. In the second stage, 13 front-line experts were interviewed to develop initial practice-based programme theory. In the third stage, evidence identified in the first stage was appraised based on rigour and relevance, and selected to refine programme theory focusing on what works, why and under what circumstances.Results A total of 74 academic and 10 policy sources were included. The review identified 12 mechanisms to achieve: patient-centric complaint handling and system-wide quality improvement. The complaint handling pathway includes (1) access of information; (2) collaboration with support and advocacy services; (3) staff attitude and signposting; (4) bespoke responding; and (5) public accountability. The improvement pathway includes (6) a reliable coding taxonomy; (7) standardised training and guidelines; (8) a centralised informatics system; (9) appropriate data sampling; (10) mixed-methods spotlight analysis; (11) board priorities and leadership; and (12) just culture.Discussion If healthcare settings are better supported to report, analyse and use complaints data in a standardised manner, complaints could impact on care quality in important ways. This review has established a range of evidence-based, short-term recommendations to achieve this.
AU - van,Dael J
AU - Reader,T
AU - Gillespie,A
AU - Neves,A
AU - Darzi,A
AU - Mayer,E
DO - 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009704
EP - 695
PY - 2020///
SN - 2044-5415
SP - 684
TI - Learning from complaints in healthcare: a realist review of academic literature, policy evidence, and frontline insights
T2 - BMJ Quality and Safety
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009704
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/76594
VL - 29
ER -
