BibTex format
@inproceedings{Baroni:2018,
author = {Baroni, P and Rago, A and Toni, F},
publisher = {AAAI},
title = {How many Properties do we need for Gradual Argumentation?},
url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/54318},
year = {2018}
}
RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)
TY - CPAPER
AB - The study of properties of gradual evaluation methods inargumentation has received increasing attention in recentyears, with studies devoted to various classes of frame-works/methods leading to conceptually similar but formallydistinct properties in different contexts. In this paper we pro-vide a systematic analysis for this research landscape by mak-ing three main contributions. First, we identify groups of con-ceptually related properties in the literature, which can be re-garded as based on common patterns and, using these pat-terns, we evidence that many further properties can be consid-ered. Then, we provide a simplifying and unifying perspec-tive for these properties by showing that they are all impliedby the parametric principles of (either strict or non-strict) bal-ance and monotonicity. Finally, we show that (instances of)these principles are satisfied by several quantitative argumen-tation formalisms in the literature, thus confirming their gen-eral validity and their utility to support a compact, yet com-prehensive, analysis of properties of gradual argumentation.
AU - Baroni,P
AU - Rago,A
AU - Toni,F
PB - AAAI
PY - 2018///
TI - How many Properties do we need for Gradual Argumentation?
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/54318
ER -