BibTex format
@inproceedings{Schulz:2019,
author = {Schulz, C and Toni, F},
pages = {6382--6386},
title = {On the responsibility for undecisiveness in preferred and stable labellings in abstract argumentation (extended abstract)},
year = {2019}
}
RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)
TY - CPAPER
AB - © 2019 International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence. All rights reserved. Different semantics of abstract Argumentation Frameworks (AFs) provide different levels of decisiveness for reasoning about the acceptability of conflicting arguments. The stable semantics is useful for applications requiring a high level of decisiveness, as it assigns to each argument the label “accepted” or the label “rejected”. Unfortunately, stable labellings are not guaranteed to exist, thus raising the question as to which parts of AFs are responsible for the non-existence. In this paper, we address this question by investigating a more general question concerning preferred labellings (which may be less decisive than stable labellings but are always guaranteed to exist), namely why a given preferred labelling may not be stable and thus undecided on some arguments. In particular, (1) we give various characterisations of parts of an AF, based on the given preferred labelling, and (2) we show that these parts are indeed responsible for the undecisiveness if the preferred labelling is not stable. We then use these characterisations to explain the non-existence of stable labellings.
AU - Schulz,C
AU - Toni,F
EP - 6386
PY - 2019///
SN - 1045-0823
SP - 6382
TI - On the responsibility for undecisiveness in preferred and stable labellings in abstract argumentation (extended abstract)
ER -